The State Bank of India (SBI) has requested additional time to provide the Election Commission of India (ECI) with data regarding electoral bonds. This development follows a recent verdict by the Supreme Court of India, which declared the electoral bonds scheme null and void. The scheme, introduced in 2018, allowed for anonymous funding to political parties, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in political funding.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court directed SBI to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties to the Election Commission by March 6. The court emphasized the importance of transparency in political funding and the need for political parties to disclose information about their sources of funding.
The electoral bonds scheme had been contentious since its inception. While the government argued that it was aimed at bringing transparency and curbing black money in political funding, critics raised concerns about the anonymity of donors and the potential for misuse of the system. The Supreme Court’s verdict came in response to a petition challenging the constitutional validity of the scheme.
The court held that the electoral bonds scheme violated the constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to information. The bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, noted that the scheme did not achieve its stated objectives and instead undermined transparency in political funding.
Following the court’s directive, SBI, which serves as the authorized bank for issuing electoral bonds, is now required to provide detailed information about the electoral bonds encashed by political parties. This information includes the date of encashment and the denomination of each electoral bond.
The decision to annul the electoral bonds scheme is significant as it reflects the judiciary’s commitment to upholding transparency and accountability in the electoral process. Political parties play a crucial role in a democratic society, and their funding sources should be open to public scrutiny to ensure fairness and integrity in elections.
The Supreme Court’s verdict has been welcomed by transparency advocates and civil society organizations, who have long called for greater transparency in political funding. They argue that anonymous donations undermine the democratic process and create opportunities for corruption and undue influence.
However, some political parties and government officials have expressed reservations about the court’s decision. They argue that the electoral bonds scheme was intended to encourage legitimate political donations and prevent the flow of black money into the political system. They also contend that the annulment of the scheme could have unintended consequences for political funding and campaign financing.
In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, SBI has sought additional time to compile and provide the necessary data to the Election Commission. The bank faces the challenge of sorting through a large volume of transactions and ensuring accuracy and completeness in the information provided.
The Election Commission, on its part, is expected to review the data provided by SBI and take appropriate action to ensure compliance with electoral laws and regulations. The commission plays a crucial role in overseeing the conduct of elections and enforcing transparency and accountability standards.
Overall, the annulment of the electoral bonds scheme represents a significant step towards strengthening transparency and accountability in political funding. By requiring political parties to disclose details of their funding sources, the Supreme Court’s decision promotes greater openness and fairness in the electoral process.
