• HINDI
  • JaiTV
  • Login
Ganga News Today
  • HOME
  • INDIA
  • WORLD
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • BUSINESS
  • FASHION
  • TECH
  • LIFESTYLE
  • SPORTS
  • OTHERS
    • PEOPLE
    • OPINION
    • BREAKING NEWS
    • INFO
    • SOCIAL
    • VIDEOS
No Result
View All Result
Ganga News Today
  • HOME
  • INDIA
  • WORLD
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • BUSINESS
  • FASHION
  • TECH
  • LIFESTYLE
  • SPORTS
  • OTHERS
    • PEOPLE
    • OPINION
    • BREAKING NEWS
    • INFO
    • SOCIAL
    • VIDEOS
No Result
View All Result
Ganga News Today
No Result
View All Result
Home INDIA

Use of Filthy Language by Estranged Couples Not Cruelty

by Ayushi
March 30, 2024
in INDIA
The remarks came from a single-judge bench of Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, who was hearing a petition filed by Sahdeo Gupta and his son Naresh Kumar Gupta, both residents of Bokaro in adjoining Jharkhand.
X (Twitter)FacebookWhatsappTelegram

The Patna High Court recently made a significant observation regarding the use of “filthy language” by estranged couples, stating that such behavior does not necessarily amount to “cruelty” in matrimonial disputes. This insight emerged during a hearing presided over by Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, who was addressing a petition filed by Sahdeo Gupta and his son Naresh Kumar Gupta, both residents of Bokaro in neighboring Jharkhand.

 

The petitioners had challenged an order issued by courts in Bihar’s Nalanda district, stemming from a complaint filed by Naresh Gupta’s divorced wife in Nawada, her hometown. The complaint, dating back to 1994, accused the husband and father-in-law of physical and material abuse, allegedly in pursuit of dowry, specifically a car.

RelatedPosts

Priyanka Gandhi speech in inauguration ceremony of the ATTOI Tourism Convention Wayanad

Maha Kumbh 2025 Sees Record 600 Tons of Floating Waste Recycling, Offers Lessons for Many

PM Shri Narendra Modi Inaugurates Namo Hospital in Silvassa

 

Initially lodged in Nawada, the case was later transferred to Nalanda following a request by the father-son duo. Subsequently, in 2008, the Chief Judicial Magistrate sentenced them to a year of rigorous imprisonment. Despite appealing to the Additional Sessions Court a decade later, their appeal was rejected.

 

Meanwhile, the couple obtained a divorce from the Jharkhand High Court. In opposition to the petition before the Patna High Court, the advocate representing the divorced woman argued that the use of derogatory terms like “bhoot” (ghost) and “pishach” (vampire) by the in-laws amounted to significant cruelty, especially considering the context of the 21st century.

 

However, the Patna High Court, in its observations, declined to accept this argument outright. The court noted that while instances of verbal abuse and derogatory language were not uncommon in failed matrimonial relationships, not all such accusations necessarily constituted cruelty. In this specific case, the court emphasized that while the woman had indeed faced harassment and torture, there were no specific and distinct allegations against either petitioner regarding the use of derogatory language.

 

Therefore, the court quashed the judgments passed by the lower courts, indicating that the allegations did not meet the threshold for constituting cruelty. Importantly, the ruling sheds light on the complexities and nuances involved in adjudicating matrimonial disputes, especially concerning verbal abuse and its legal implications.

 

Matrimonial disputes often involve a myriad of emotional and legal complexities, with verbal abuse being one of the many issues that come to light during such proceedings. In many cases, estranged couples resort to using derogatory language or hurling insults at each other, which can further escalate tensions and exacerbate the acrimony between them.

 

However, determining whether such behavior amounts to cruelty within the context of matrimonial law requires a thorough examination of the circumstances and evidence presented. While verbal abuse can undoubtedly cause emotional distress and psychological harm, courts must assess whether it meets the legal criteria for cruelty as defined by relevant statutes and precedents.

 

In the case before the Patna High Court, the judgment underscores the importance of establishing a clear and specific nexus between the alleged acts of cruelty and the parties involved. While the woman had alleged harassment and torture, the court found insufficient evidence to support the claim that derogatory language constituted cruelty in this instance.

 

Moreover, the ruling highlights the need for a nuanced approach to adjudicating matrimonial disputes, taking into account the complex dynamics and emotional undercurrents inherent in such cases. Judges must carefully weigh the evidence presented by both parties and apply legal principles judiciously to ensure fair and just outcomes.

 

Ultimately, the Patna High Court’s observation serves as a reminder of the challenges involved in navigating matrimonial disputes and the importance of applying legal principles with sensitivity and discernment. By recognizing the nuances surrounding verbal abuse and cruelty in such cases, courts can uphold the principles of justice and equity while promoting amicable resolutions wherever possible.

Tags: cruelty in marriagedivorce caseslegal rulingsmatrimonial disputesPatna High Courtverbal abuse
Previous Post

Bharat Ratna Conferred Posthumously: PM Modi’s Tribute

Next Post

Navjot Singh Sidhu Praises Rohit Sharma’s Contribution

Related Posts

Priyanka Gandhi speech in inauguration ceremony of the ATTOI Tourism Convention Wayanad

Priyanka Gandhi speech in inauguration ceremony of the ATTOI Tourism Convention Wayanad

March 30, 2025
Maha Kumbh 2025 Sees Record 600 Tons of Floating Waste Recycling, Offers Lessons for Many

Maha Kumbh 2025 Sees Record 600 Tons of Floating Waste Recycling, Offers Lessons for Many

March 11, 2025
PM Shri Narendra Modi Inaugurates Namo Hospital in Silvassa

PM Shri Narendra Modi Inaugurates Namo Hospital in Silvassa

March 10, 2025
World Animal Protection Approaches Prime Minister to Prevent Elephant Transfer to Delhi from Assam

World Animal Protection Approaches Prime Minister to Prevent Elephant Transfer to Delhi from Assam

October 19, 2024
Quality control order (QCO) regulating footwear imports has been extended till 1 August 2024

India Mandates ISI Mark on Foreign Luxury Shoes

March 31, 2024
The inflated Uber ride bill “did not include a Goods and Services Tax (GST),” the viral post claimed.

Noida Man Receives Rs. 7.66 Crore Uber Bill for ₹26 Auto Ride

March 31, 2024
Next Post
Rohit Sharma is playing under Hardik Pandya's captaincy at MI this season, having been removed from his role.

Navjot Singh Sidhu Praises Rohit Sharma's Contribution

Recent News

Vidyut Jammwal Joins the Spykar Movement with the Launch of Chico Fit

Vidyut Jammwal Joins the Spykar Movement with the Launch of Chico Fit

May 29, 2025

Digital Gold vs Physical Gold : Which is Better

May 14, 2025
Truecaller Introduces Scamfeed : A User-Powered Defense Against Scams

Truecaller Introduces Scamfeed : A User-Powered Defense Against Scams

April 29, 2025
TVS Motor Company Unveils the Upgraded TVS Apache RR 310 with Advanced Features

TVS Motor Company Unveils the Upgraded TVS Apache RR 310 with Advanced Features

April 26, 2025
Lava Announces Exciting Smartphone Offers; Agni 3 Available for as Low as ₹16,999

Lava Announces Exciting Smartphone Offers; Agni 3 Available for as Low as ₹16,999

April 22, 2025
What Indian Car Lovers Can Expect from the VinFast VF 6

What Indian Car Lovers Can Expect from the VinFast VF 6

April 17, 2025
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISE
  • Hindi – हिंदी
FOLLOW US

© Ganga News Today

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Login
DTV
  • HOME
  • INDIA
  • WORLD
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • BUSINESS
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFESTYLE
  • SPORTS
  • FASHION
  • HEALTH
  • PEOPLE

© Ganga News Today

Go to mobile version